home page

Lynch v. Donnelly

465 U.S. 668 (1984)

The Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons Religious Institutions Group gratefully acknowledges the contribution of the Ethics and Public Policy Center which provided the following case commentary taken from Terry Eastland, Religious Liberty in the Supreme Court: The Cases That Define the Debate over Church and State (1993).

Is it constitutional for a city to include a Nativity scene in its annual Christmas display? Yes, said the Supreme Court in Lynch v. Donnelly. The Court did not justify its decision on what would have been the broad and, indeed, precedent-shattering ground that the government may support religion. Instead, applying the three-part Lemon test, it found a legitimate secular purpose for the crèche: "to celebrate," as Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote in his opinion for the Court, "the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday." This non-religious view of the crèche was vigorously disputed by Justices William Brennan and Harry Blackmun.

The city of Pawtucket, Rhode Island, erected a Christmas display as part of its observance of the holiday season. Among the items in the display, all owned by the city, were a Santa Claus house, reindeer pulling Santa's sleigh, a Christmas tree, and a clown, as well as a crèche consisting of the Infant Jesus, Mary and Joseph, angels, shepherds and kings, and animals. The display was located in a park owned by a nonprofit organization. Some residents of the city who were members of the American Civil Liberties Union, along with the ACLU itself, challenged the display as an establishment of religion. The district court agreed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed. In a 5—4 decision, the Supreme Court reversed that judgment.

Lynch produced three opinions in addition to the majority opinion written by the Chief Justice and expressing the views of five justices. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor joined the Court's opinion but also wrote separately. Justice William Brennan, joined by Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, and John Paul Stevens, wrote in dissent; Justice Blackmun also dissented separately, joined by Justice Stevens. The four opinions in the case are presented here, followed by an editorial from the Wall Street Journal.

Five years after Lynch, in Allegheny County v. ACLU, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, the Court found unconstitutional the display of a crèche in a public building; this crèche was not surrounded by other, more secular holiday decorations. In the same case the Court also refused to declare unconstitutional the public display of a menorah; the menorah survived constitutional challenge because it was flanked by secular symbols.

Participating in Lynch v. Donnelly, decided March 5, 1984, were Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Associate Justices Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, and Byron R. White.


DISCLAIMER / ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Copyright © 2002-2010 by Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP. All rights reserved.














Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP

Denver: 303-623-9000
Colorado Springs: 719-386-3000
Casper: 307-232-0222

Click here to contact us.